Home High Thinktank
Page 3 of 3

Use of High Thinktank Methods
When Working Alone

o Accumulate six or more questions in a box, each question on a separate index card or scrap of (folded in on itself) paper. Because you have written these, your subtler resources will know which is which, but if you randomize these questions and pick one at random, your conscious left temporal isn't likely to recognize which one is which, and will most likely get out of the way of the visual data-flow coming from the rest of the brain in answer to that question. Your objective is not to "psyche" which question that is, but simply to look at what your mind is showing you as answer to it.

o On the question you thus select, get three sets of imagery on each question. As in the group form, this gives you a basis for comparison. Be sure to get enough sensory detail recorded from each image that it will be easy for you to spot where one of the many aspects of the one image matches with one of the many aspects of another image. Each image coming from your richer resources is rich with many meanings and messages, but each image generated within a given context as answer, context defined by this "hidden question" you are holding, contains among these in some form your main or key answer(s) as well. This comparison, looking for common elements or for themes running among your several different images, makes this key meaning or meanings stand out above all the other messages for you and makes this key far easier for you to spot and to experience your "aha"!

o Only after you've mapped out these detailed comparisons among your several various images or impressions, should you then look at the "hidden question," read it consciously, and examine how those common elements or theme do actually answer that particular question.

o Be sure to replace the answered question with another so you keep up a minimum stock of six at any given time to draw from, keeping that old left-temporal guesser from getting back into the act.

Your questions should be very different from one another, so the answer to one isn't confusable with that to another. Doing two to four such questions per day for a few days should give you the feel for allowing the flow to come from wider sectors of your brain, so that then you can resume doing regular Image-Streaming undirected even by such questions (though you might also keep up this Q/A process as well, which can be very instructive!).

High Thinktank apparently does different things to develop the brain than does Image-Streaming:

Besides the convenience of speed, there are apparently some things in the brain which High Thinktanking does which not even Image-Streaming does. We don't know quite what's going on with the brain with this, but see some extraordinary abilities develop and remarkable things happen which we've not seen even with regular sustained practice of Image-Streaming.

Until we know more about it, we strongly recommend some practice of both, to encourage as wide a range as possible of neurons and brain circuitry activated and abilities developed.

Both Image-Streaming and High Thinktank are Modern Einsteinian/Socratic Method. Both reinforce not only subtler awarenesses into better contact with our conscious word box, but the brain and mental faculties from which those subtler awarenesses spring. Yet it is clear, from those of us who have pursued the "30-Day Challenge" (see below), that these two seemingly similar procedures are doing very different things in the brain and integrating our brains in very different configurations, both of them good.

Whoever can arrange to obtain detailed scans of brains, while engaged in each of these two seemingly like but very different procedures, will get his/her name into historic footnotes in a lot of future texts. Use of both of these remarkably beneficial procedures is bound to spread and to increasingly affect events, and the principles behind them are bound to find further and still more useful application.


O




The 30-day Challenge

Daily practice of Image-Streaming does not appear to present any problems even though it commits several times more time. It has been rare, however, for people to succeed with at least one thinktanked question every day for a full 30 days, for reasons as yet not fully understood (though one of our members reached more than one hundred consecutive days and counting). That rarity shows it to be a real challenge for you, to be able to run at least one question each day through the high thinktanking process for a full 30 days. If you succeed, we fully guarantee you not only some of the most intriguing experiences of your life, but skills and awarenesses which you did not consciously possess before, to an extent even more striking than is the case with Image Streaming.

O


The High Thinktank Kit
This simple kit is designed to make it as easy as possible for you to process questions using high thinktank. You need a small envelope which you can carry around in a shirt or jacket pocket (along with your Portable Memory Bank!!!) and whip out to use as you get a chance — a pause before or after telephone calls; just before or after you've propped your feet up in front of the TV; a few minutes before or after lunch or dinner; when you are riding in a conveyance with someone else doing the driving. You probably have 20 to 50 such opportunities each day. All we ask, minimally, is that you use at least one such opportunity each day and try to do so for thirty consecutive days. Failing thirty, if you miss one, try to get in 29 of those 30, or 28.... Things will still happen.

Within that envelope, you should carry 8 to 12 questions, each on a folded slip of white paper, and several more such slips of paper, on which you have written your own questions, whose stake and interest will help keep you motivated enough to see your experiment/challenge through. We are providing a page of "white" questions you can print out and cut up into those separate white folded-in slips for the envelope, to help you get started.

Also carry in this envelope six or more green slips of paper (or at least a different color of paper). Each of these folded-in "greenslips" has a different (follow-up) question on it. What kind of follow-up question? See the examples provided in the page of "green" questions, which you can likewise print out on green paper and cut up into those separate green slips folded-in for the envelope, to help you get started.

O


Using the Kit
Here are the seven simple steps.
1. Select a folded-in white question, without looking to consciously see what it says.

2. Gather three different sets of impressions or images. Each of these is the same answer to the same question, only shown differently.

3. On your notepad, describe or sketch enough detail from these impressions to make it easy to see where they overlap.

4. Find the common theme(s), trends or threads.

5. Open your question and see how that element(s)-in-common answers the question.

6. Make sure you have a minimum of six white questions in your envelope/pool toward next time.

7. Select one of the green questions and answer it the same way. Depending on the importance of what you're dealing with, you may want to do an additional green question or so on it.
You may want to keep some sort of journal or diary in which to record the surprising things you start to notice, in yourself or around you, by or before the fifth consecutive day of this thinktanking challenge. Send us your most interesting findings on the informal questionnaire provided.

O


Summary instructions for 30-day question challenge
o Always 6 or more questions in the pot or pocket, to keep the guesser out of the way.

o Face down or folded in on themselves to "conceal" the question from consciousness.

o Take any one question, gather 3 images or impressions each of which is the same answer to that question, just shown differently. As much detail as you can get on these three, to better spot the ways in which those impressions of the answer overlap. Maybe 3 to 5 minutes detailing on first impression, 1 to 2 minutes on each of the others.

o Identify the common elements or trend or theme(s) of your images/impressions, taken together.

o Look at your question, determine how your answers answer it.

o Pose such follow-up questions as you may want to, and record your answers.

o Replace the answered question with new one, into your pot or pocket.
We suggest either a special small box, or a special envelope for your pocket, into which you can put your questions and some writing material and a pen.

O


The challenge
1. Few of us have managed thus far to make 30 straight days.

2. Please keep a detailed record of your experiences, answers and observations. The originals will be kept confidential; you may be invited to edit a version for publication. See the convenient questionnaire form you can print out and use.
O


Suggested guides to questions
o A variety

o Looking toward positive, win-win outcomes instead of zero-sum win-lose. Example: "How best can I earn a raise from my boss," instead of "How can I make my boss give me a raise."

o Open-ended instead of yes-no gives your faculties more room in which to answer effectively.

o Questions on which you truly desire to get good answers.
Remember—to the extent an issue is important, you will want to verify before acting upon it. Your own images can tell you how to verify, if you ask them.

Remember—an answer isn't a solution until it is actually implemented.

Remember—one excellent way to check out your ways of implementing an answer is to run the Win-Win Finder on it. Another is to determine what your first concrete step toward implementing it actually is, then take that first concrete step and assess matters from there.


O

Comments and filled-out questionnaire to
Win Wenger


User Feedback


This brief may be freely copied—in whole, but not in part, including its
copyright notice—for use with people whom you care about.
Home | CPS Techniques index | High Thinktank | 2 | 3 | User Feedback |
Contact:   Project Renaissance
PO Box 332, Gaithersburg, MD 20884-0332
301-948-1122 phone

©1996, 1998, 1999-2011 Project Renaissance