Input and Output
by Christopher Gooch
If you understand all the concepts presented in Dr. Wengerís article, Feeding the Loop, you will understand everything behind his techniques, everything thatís wrong with the accelerated learning movement, and how we learn everything. So I suggest that, if you havenít yet done so, you sit down and
read that article. If, however, you have already read it, yet you havenít fully grasped it, keep reading this article.
There are, and have been throughout history, two schools of thought. One says that we get and learn everything we need through experience alone. John Locke was a proponent of this theory, and he suggested that the mind, before experiencing anything, is like a blank slate. The other theory, which was held by Lockeís contemporary, Rene Descartes, is that we have innate ideas implanted inside us. This theory stresses that the things we learn are obtained by reason, and reasoning things out.
So, to simplify it even further, one is practical and focused on experiencing things, while the other is theoretical and concerned with reasoning out abstract theories. One stresses practice and purports experience, the other theory and reason.
It turns out, though, that experience alone is not enough to bring understanding
and learning, nor is it reason alone. It is the conscious internalizing of what one experiences through our faculty of reason (or the mind). So what brings understanding and learning is the combination of the two.
How is that internalizing accomplished? When we receive feedback about
something we experienced, we have internalized it.
However, it is further complicated because there are two different types of
feedback external and internal. External feedback is that which we receive
from the outside world touching, feeling, hearing, seeing, and smelling
anything in person. Internal feedback, on the other hand, is that which we
receive from our inner world from what we actively do, of ourselves.
For instance, we get external sensory feedback from hearing something or reading
it, while we get internal feedback from something that we do when we speak,
for example, we get feedback from doing so. External feedback is feedback
we get from something we perceive, while internal feedback is feedback we
get from something we do. External feedback may come from reading a book,
watching a video, hearing a lecture, etc.; it comes from feedback that comes
Internal feedback can thus come from thinking, speaking, acting, writing, and so on; it is feedback we get from outputting (not only physically or audibly outputting thinking and writing are considered output in this sense).
Though the information usually comes from external feedback, the only way we
can learn and understand something is if it comes in with the internal feedback. It must be noted that internal feedback is not enough everything we experience in life comes back as internal feedback. But only a small portion of it is conscious internal feedback.
If we only learn something when it comes with the internal conscious feedback, you may hear that "Dogs are animals," but until you actually think the thought (or speak it, or whatever), you can never understand it. Of course, understanding something doesnít mean that you agree with it. In order for you to understand something, it has to ride in off the feedback you receive from your own actions.
At the same time, it is not just any of our actions that give us this positive, conscious, internal feedback. If we are forced to mindlessly repeat "dogs are animals" a hundred times a day like a mantra, it does follow that we should really understand that fact. So in order for it to be effective and conducive to real learning, our actions should be done of our own will and volition.
What it really boils down to is this: though the inputting is important, it
is only when we output it that we actually learn. Regardless that the method of inputting may be anything (and some methods of input may have more virtue than others), no real learning occurs until we actually voluntarily output whatever it is that we want to learn. On the one hand, the input is significant because without the input there would be no learning, but at the same time the stress should not be placed
on the input but on the output, because that is where the real learning occurs.
Once you understand this, you will understand everything that is wrong about
the public and most of the private school systems. The public (and some
private) schools try to shove the information down the studentsí throats
through various inputting methods. But the students will never learn the
information until they start outputting it! This is why so many of the
public and private school students fail. The ones that succeed have somehow
willingly and consciously output the information (through thinking about it,
writing about it, speaking about it, drawing it, etc.).
Certainly accelerated learning has developed many advanced and far faster
methods of input than the usual ones. And, though the majority of them are
coupled with effective outputting techniques (to facilitate real learning),
many times people lose the correct focus on the output. Not to disparage
the accelerated learning movement (far from it), we have to remember that
real learning comes when we receive conscious internal feedback from our own
Thatís not to say that the inputting is unimportant. It is vital. But the
inputting is useless unless the information is consciously internalized and
becomes yours through outputting.
Why is this? It has to come from you. We place much more importance upon
something that comes from ourselves than that which comes from other sources. The plain fact is, it must come from you if you are going to learn and understand it. And so, everything weíve learned in life has come from our outputting.
Countless ways of outputting exist, including Image-Streaming, Freenoting,
Windtunneling and other of Dr. Wengerís techniques. When these (as well as
other ways of output) are coupled with effective inputting methods, real
learning learning that brings understanding will occur.
How can we take advantage of understanding the model of how we learn? How
does it revolutionize the way we learn? How can we apply it?
First, donít overstress the input, yet donít downplay it. Input and output
are both necessary, and if we use only one, no learning can or will take
Second, shift the focus to our own outputs and the fact that in order to
learn, we have to receive conscious feedback from our own sources. (Refer
to the diagram of the model in Feeding the Loop.) Once the information has
been input, through whatever method, output it somehow.
As far as output is concerned, there are innumerable techniques at your disposal not only Dr. Wengerís Image-Streaming (and all its variations), Freenoting, Windtunneling and other procedures, but just plain old thinking, discussing, debating, writing, speaking, drawing, as well as mindmapping (which is great for summarizing and, at the same time, is an output that involves the creative side of the brain).
Another is the simple idea of teaching the subject to someone far younger than you which helps you understand it not only because it is a willful output, but also because you have to clearly explain complicated topics so that someone with a lower vocabulary can understand it). The ways of outputting, as well as inputting, are almost limitless.
Hopefully you now understand the significance of Dr. Wengerís article, Feeding the Loop, and have a much better model for understanding how we learn. If you really employ this model when you learn stressing the combination of input and output your learning speed will take quantum leaps!
Comments or discussion? Post them here:
Project Renaissance Message Board
You may copy this brief in whole but not in part,
including its copyright for use with people
whom you care about or wish to inform.