Perceptions
Like a young child gazing at a cloudscape and seeing animals or faces, or
like gazing into a fireplace like Kekule and seeing snakes or cities or
castles or landscapes, our mind and brain Gestalts undefined or complex
perceptions toward something more familiarly recognized and/or relevant.
In that regard, then, you might find it helpful to your own efforts to
range over my following uninformed naive babbles and try to instill some
sense into me....
I understand that most physicists and cosmologists currently accept
paired-particle creation ongoing throughout space and time, and that some hold
that all our own physical universe of material and energy is only one of many
variously tiny bubbles into material existence from some more
fundamental substrate. Big to us because we're in the midst of it...
Many of the quantum-oriented tend to "view" sub-atomic phenomena not as
particles but as a resonance. (Resonance of what?) As patterns of ripples
rather than as particles.
Resonance of what?
To properly appreciate that question, sometime you should watch, live or on
video, demonstration of a sand tray with various sounds and tones being
rippled through it. Or standing water in your kitchen sink when you have the
garbage disposal running under it. Is each sub-atomic particle really like
one of those standing-wave ripples? And if so, what's there that's being
rippled?
Using systems theory to think about sub-atomic waves and ripple:
By definition, a system is the interaction between two or more elements
(whether things or processes). What are the two or more elements which are
required to comprise what we recognize as a sub-atomic particle?
Even if for initially stochastic reasons, some systems last longer than
others. By one or more of the eight strategies for doing so that Dr. Wenger has identified in Toward a General Theory of Systems, what sustains a sub-atomic ripple/wave/particle?
Regarding paired-particle spin issues:
What conveys (if indeed Bell's Theorem really is demonstrated empirically)
effects at a distance?
One response, from string theory and related corners of the inquiry, seems to be that in some dimensions the distance doesn't exist, so the transmission of whatever energy is direct, requiring no medium or agent in-between.
Another, choosing not to posit extra dimensions, argues some sort of transmittal of energy by resonance, by mystical psychic or spiritual force of some sort, or by some other as-yet undefined form of energy.
Can all of this be but one phenomenon?
If we could address it in terms of resonance,
What would be resonating?
In what medium is the resonance occurring?
What can the resonance itself tell us about the medium? About the thing
resonating? About other forms of resonance?
Mind map
The "mind map" shown here encompasses elements representative of these phenomena. What are some of the multiple relationships that you can perceive to exist between these elements?

Side-speculation:
We certainly do find spirituality (however defined) and great art in frequent
association, though we've always assumed:
That was because, historically, the church usually was the only party wealthy enough to patronize and commission the artists; and
That it was largely a matter of "make a joyful noise unto
the Lord," rather than the Greek notion of an originating source of
inspiration from the Muses.
All of this, thus far, can be said without any assumptions or speculations
about the existence and nature of deity, afterlife, or any extrasensory
phenomena. Thus there is permissible ground for scientific investigation
within the boundary agreement between Galileo and the Church.
But all this is perhaps but a sideband relative to the central or
Substrate issue....